Terug naar Encyclopedie

Evidence in Non-Material Damage Claims in Utrecht

Learn which items of evidence are crucial for non-material damage claims in Utrecht: medical reports from UMC Utrecht, witnesses, and proving causation at the District Court of Midden-Nederland.

2 min leestijd

Evidence in Non-Material Damage Claims in Utrecht

In Utrecht, demonstrating non-material damage requires solid evidence, as psychological suffering is subjective. Victims must prove causation between the unlawful act and their complaints, in accordance with Article 6:162 of the Dutch Civil Code. Local courts such as the District Court of Midden-Nederland in Utrecht strictly scrutinise objective substantiation in cases involving traffic accidents on the A12 or incidents in the city centre.

Essential Items of Evidence

  • Medical records: Reports from general practitioners in Utrecht-Noord, specialists at UMC Utrecht or therapists in the neighbourhood centres.
  • Psychological tests: Scores on PTSD or depression scales, administered at Utrecht psychology practices.
  • Witness statements: From family, colleagues or neighbours from Utrecht regarding behavioural changes after an accident at the station or on the Neude.
  • Diaries and photos: Personal records of pain and limitations, supported by local archives.

Procedural Steps in Utrecht

Step 1: Submit a claim to the insurer, often via Utrecht insurance offices. Step 2: Request an expert examination at UMC Utrecht or an independent expert. Step 3: Proceed to the District Court of Midden-Nederland in case of dispute. The Act on Confiscating Criminally Obtained Profit provides additional support in violence cases around the Janskerkhof. Success depends on objective substantiation; subjective stories alone rarely convince the Utrecht cantonal judge.

Tip: Keep all relevant documents from day one and consult a personal injury lawyer from Utrecht for a strong file, for example via the Oranjerie expertise.