Terug naar Encyclopedie

European Influence on Dismissal Protection in Utrecht: What Is Changing?

CJEU and ECtHR rulings strengthen dismissal protection in Utrecht: stricter discrimination tests, higher sanctions, and transparency obligations for local employers.

1 min leestijd

European Influence on Dismissal Protection in Utrecht: What Is Changing?

EU law strengthens dismissal rules in Utrecht against discriminatory termination. Which rulings by the ECtHR and CJEU affect Utrecht-based employers and subdistrict court judges?

Key EU Rulings

The CJEU ruled in Case C-68/17 that age discrimination must be strictly scrutinized, which is particularly relevant for Utrecht’s sectors such as healthcare and education. The ECtHR, in Romania v. The Netherlands, mandated effective remedies, thereby sharpening the approach of the Utrecht subdistrict court within the District Court of Midden-Nederland.

Consequences for Utrecht

  • Stricter scrutiny: Proportional reasons required, especially in dismissals involving Utrecht University or the municipality.
  • Sanctions: Higher compensation in case of violations, with the Utrecht Legal Aid Office serving as a support line for employees.
  • Transparency: Employers in Utrecht are obligated to justify reasons for dismissal, supported by local trade unions.

The Work and Security Act (WWZ) complies with EU law, but new directives raise the thresholds for businesses in Utrecht. Local judges apply these in cases concerning flexible work in the Domstad. Consult the District Court of Utrecht for advice. (218 words)