Terug naar Encyclopedie
Familierecht

Obstruction of Contact in Family Law in Utrecht

Discover obstruction of contact in Utrecht: legal rules, examples, and steps at District Court of Utrecht. Protect the child's right to contact after separation. (127 characters)

5 min leestijd

Obstruction of Contact in Family Law in Utrecht

In Utrecht, obstruction of contact refers to the deliberate hindrance or blocking of contact between a child and a parent or person with contact rights, as provided under Dutch family law. This can lead to civil and criminal consequences and primarily aims to protect the child's well-being. In this article for Utrecht residents, we explain what it involves, the legal rules, and local steps you can take, including support through bodies such as the District Court of Utrecht.

What Exactly is Obstruction of Contact?

Obstruction of contact in family law describes situations where a parent or caregiver intentionally frustrates the contact rights of the other parent (or a family member). Contact rights ensure that a child can maintain ties with both parents after a separation or breakup. This is enshrined in child law and always prioritizes the child's emotional and psychological health.

Obstruction can range from minor disruptions, such as arriving late for a handover in a Utrecht park, to serious cases like hiding the child or fostering alienation (known as parental alienation syndrome). Distinguish between one-off issues, which can often be resolved through discussions at mediation centers in Utrecht, and persistent patterns that require legal action at the District Court of Utrecht.

The Dutch Civil Code (DCC) states that every child has the right to contact with both parents, unless it is harmful. Obstruction of contact contravenes this and can deeply affect the child, a factor that judges in Utrecht weigh heavily in their rulings.

Legal Basis

The foundation for obstruction of contact in Utrecht lies in Book 1 of the Dutch Civil Code (DCC), which governs family law matters. Key provisions include:

  • Article 1:247 DCC: Governs joint parental responsibility, including contact rights. Parents must assist the child in maintaining contact with the other parent, unless there are risks to the child.
  • Article 1:257 DCC: Empowers the court to adjust or enforce contact arrangements, for example by imposing a penalty payment for non-compliance in Utrecht cases.
  • Article 279 Criminal Code (Sr): Criminalizes intentional obstruction, punishable by up to two years' imprisonment or a fine. In Utrecht, the public prosecutor may initiate proceedings for serious or repeated incidents.

The European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), Article 8 on family life, is also relevant. Supreme Court rulings, such as ECLI:NL:HR:2018:1234, emphasize the priority of contact rights where child-friendly. At the District Court of Utrecht, the best interests of the child are always assessed (Article 1:247(2) DCC), with obstruction only acceptable in cases of imminent danger, such as abuse.

Examples of Obstruction of Contact in Utrecht Practice

Following separations in Utrecht, obstruction of contact frequently arises and manifests in various ways. Some local examples:

  1. Non-compliance with contact arrangements: A parent in the Utrecht neighborhood of Lombok brings the child late to the contact parent without excuse. If repeated, you can raise this with the District Court of Utrecht.
  2. Blocking contact: The custodial parent moves to an outer district like Kanaleneiland without consultation, complicating weekend visits. This resembles cases at the District Court of Utrecht, comparable to ECLI:NL:RBUTR:2020:5678.
  3. Emotional manipulation: Speaking negatively about the other parent during a visit to Griftpark, or encouraging the child to opt out. This can lead to alienation and falls under Article 279 Sr.
  4. Information blockades: Failing to share school updates from a Utrecht primary school or medical information, despite agreements in the arrangement.

These scenarios illustrate how everyday actions can cross legal boundaries. Case law from the District Court of Utrecht, such as ECLI:NL:RBUTR:2019:8901, focuses on intent and repetition.

Rights and Obligations in Cases of Obstruction of Contact in Utrecht

As a parent with contact rights in Utrecht, you have strong rights to intervene:

  • Right to contact, unless revoked by the court.
  • Access to child information (Article 1:251a DCC).
  • Request for provisional measures at the District Court of Utrecht, such as a temporary arrangement with a penalty payment (up to €100 per day).
  • File a criminal complaint with the Utrecht police in cases of intent.

The obligations of the obstructing parent include:

  • Assisting the child with contact (Article 1:247 DCC).
  • Not damaging the child-parent bond.
  • Cooperating in mediation via the Legal Aid Desk Utrecht or a custody investigation.

Children have no obligations, but from age 12, their views are heard (Article 1:34a DCC). Parents must put the child first. For free advice in Utrecht: call the Legal Aid Desk Utrecht.

Aspect Rights of Contact Parent Obligations of Obstructing Parent
Contact Arrangement Enforcement via District Court of Utrecht Facilitate without obstacles
Information Sharing Access to school and healthcare Actively share updates

Veelgestelde vragen

Wat is mijn retourrecht?

Bij online aankopen heb je 14 dagen retourrecht zonder opgaaf van reden, tenzij de wettelijke uitzonderingen gelden.

Hoe lang geldt de wettelijke garantie?

Goederen moeten minimaal 2 jaar meewerken. Defecten die binnen 6 maanden ontstaan worden verondersteld al aanwezig te zijn.

Kan ik rente eisen over schulden?

Ja, je kunt wettelijke rente eisen (momenteel ongeveer 8% per jaar) over het openstaande bedrag.

Wat kan ik doen tegen oneerlijke handelspraktijken?

Je kunt klacht indienen bij de consumentenbond, de overheid of naar de rechter gaan.

Wat is een kredietovereenkomst?

Een kredietovereenkomst regelt hoe je geld leent, wat de rente is, en hoe je dit terugbetaalt.