Difference between temporary and indefinite tenancy agreement in Utrecht
Temporary vs. indefinite tenancy agreement in Utrecht: key differences in duration, protection and rights, with local context for students and starters.
AA
Arslan AdvocatenLegal Editorial
1 min leestijd
In Utrecht, with its vibrant student city and tight housing market, the difference between a temporary and indefinite tenancy agreement is essential for tenants. A temporary contract (Article 7:271 DCC) ends automatically after the agreed period, offering flexibility for landlords such as with temporary student rooms in Wittevrouwen or Kanaleneiland, but less stability for tenants. It does enjoy full rent protection against rent increases. An indefinite contract (Article 7:220 DCC) continues until termination with valid grounds and statutory notice period, with strong rent protection via the Rent Tribunal in Utrecht. After a chain of temporary contracts, it is automatically converted into indefinite, a rule strictly enforced by the District Court of Midden-Nederland in Utrecht. Advantages of temporary: ideal for landlords with seasonal rentals in the Domstad. Disadvantages: uncertainty for young professionals or families in neighbourhoods like Lombok. Tax implications: temporary rent often does not qualify for owner-occupied forfait, whereas indefinite may. Disputes peak with temporary contracts due to automatic expiry, with Utrecht courts often enforcing continuation in cases of abuse. Local tip: check Utrecht rent teams for advice. Choose consciously when entering into a rental in this urgent market. (248 words)