Examples of Common Void Clauses in Utrecht's Rental Sector

In Utrecht's vibrant rental market, with thousands of students and young professionals in districts such as Kanaleneiland and Lombok, void clauses emerge that give landlords an unfair advantage. A classic example is the provision requiring tenants to pay all repair costs, whereas Article 7:243 of the Dutch Civil Code (BW) holds the landlord responsible for major maintenance. Indexation clauses that deviate from the statutory rent freeze are also void, particularly relevant given the high rents around Utrecht University. Other examples include: a prohibition on tenants carrying out painting work without permission, or automatic rent increases without proper indexation. Clauses that exclude tenants from statutory notice periods, or allow landlords to claim more than the legally permitted two months' rent as a deposit, are systematically annulled by Utrecht's subdistrict court judges. In room rental contracts – common in student housing – joint and several liability for all housemates is often void due to conflict with the principles of reasonableness and fairness. The Rent Tribunal, with an office in Utrecht, publishes lists of 'black' clauses. Landlords risk additional charges and fines from the Municipality of Utrecht if they persist in using void clauses. Tenants can challenge these through a simple letter to the landlord or via the subdistrict court in Utrecht. Always keep evidence such as the contract, payment receipts, and correspondence with housing corporations like Portaal or Haag Wonen. This helps avoid disputes and protects your rights in Utrecht's competitive rental market.